[reference asterisk *]
[The following is posted on 5-31-12 although continuance of 5-26 material]
Cow Pies:
Footnotes:
[1] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Simpson+Bowles
[2] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Bowles+Simpson
[3] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jared-bernstein/private-equity-firms-what_b_1545342.html
[4] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/05/badge-of-courage.html
[5] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/05/tar-buck.html
[6] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/05/clinton-is-full-of-bs.html
[7] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Turd
FORMER HOME OF BEATINGAROUNDTHEBUSH.ORG >> HOME OF Political_Progress_For_People.blogspot.com >> >> >> Political Prodding and Probing People for Progress << << << >>> [[ For those NOT...BeatingAroundTheBush See links.]] <<< [[ EMAIL: LeRoy-Rogers at comcast net ]]
Showing posts with label Simpson/Bowles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Simpson/Bowles. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
The History of B.S.
[Herstory and Blog Searches* aside.]
[Originally Drafted May 26, 2012]
There is a joke about what the oldest profession is, but I won’t go there. It is more or less about procreation. The B. S. I am talking about is the flip-flop of Simpson-Bowles.[1] Yes, I believe that was its name before it hit the road. It was supposed to be a bi-partisan committee on the debt, but could not come up with any consensus on how it should be addressed, so its full report was submitted more like a Supreme Court decision that was tied.
Recently it seems that its name was changed, to Bowles-Simpson.[2] Was there some reason for that? Could it be to honor the real oldest profession? And I don’t mean the Barter System. If this is too nuanced, maybe it is the joke, to be less about creation, more about pro$e. Either way this is a very economic and political history.
[More Bio-Product.]***
Speaking of PEG’d...(Private Equity Government)[3] or nailed it, Coffee Table This! [4-7] Now that is creationism.
[Now I realize that some boots may be needed for the above, but I was trying to be economic. But the point is that it is always political and it has not been bi-partisan except on the Democratic side. Pun on BP aside.** The irony is that it is about walking a plank. Both want a rising tide, but the Republicans want the people to walk the plank, while politicians take one to the other party boat. Unfortunately this may need deeper boots or Mitt-Flops for the economics, let alone politics. The B.S. may be in this writing, but it is in the links and balanced solutions as well.]
*literally I will present this without links(see footnotes later)
** bi-partisan (now that is slick)
*** oops: sorry for anachronisms
[Originally Drafted May 26, 2012]
There is a joke about what the oldest profession is, but I won’t go there. It is more or less about procreation. The B. S. I am talking about is the flip-flop of Simpson-Bowles.[1] Yes, I believe that was its name before it hit the road. It was supposed to be a bi-partisan committee on the debt, but could not come up with any consensus on how it should be addressed, so its full report was submitted more like a Supreme Court decision that was tied.
Recently it seems that its name was changed, to Bowles-Simpson.[2] Was there some reason for that? Could it be to honor the real oldest profession? And I don’t mean the Barter System. If this is too nuanced, maybe it is the joke, to be less about creation, more about pro$e. Either way this is a very economic and political history.
[More Bio-Product.]***
Speaking of PEG’d...(Private Equity Government)[3] or nailed it, Coffee Table This! [4-7] Now that is creationism.
[Now I realize that some boots may be needed for the above, but I was trying to be economic. But the point is that it is always political and it has not been bi-partisan except on the Democratic side. Pun on BP aside.** The irony is that it is about walking a plank. Both want a rising tide, but the Republicans want the people to walk the plank, while politicians take one to the other party boat. Unfortunately this may need deeper boots or Mitt-Flops for the economics, let alone politics. The B.S. may be in this writing, but it is in the links and balanced solutions as well.]
*literally I will present this without links(see footnotes later)
** bi-partisan (now that is slick)
*** oops: sorry for anachronisms
Monday, November 21, 2011
Reading between the lines...
without reading the lines. Not to just pun, but will the Super Committe fail?
Maybe it is already in the cards. Not that I have marked any C A R D. Bush tax cuts must expire. That is already in the cards. Using it as a sticking point is a joker. The president has been dealt from the bottom of the deck. Congress is the house, are we the vigorish? But actually my idea is that we use the Republican rhetoric. They have claimed he has gotten everything he asked for, and have blaimed him for not using the Simpson-Bowles suggestions. In actuality, they did not come up with a concensus, and the president put it all on the table. So the Super Committe does not have to fail, it just needs to report a non-consensus, and Congress can do their usual thing, and they can risk failure, which might be still better*. Ideally there will be up or down votes on parts of it whether they reach consensus or not. Then it will be the peoples turn to deal, at election time. It that is bringing in politics, that is what brings in the people. And that "my friends", is the name of the game, not to channel McCain.
* embedded "kick the can" misplaced
Maybe it is already in the cards. Not that I have marked any C A R D. Bush tax cuts must expire. That is already in the cards. Using it as a sticking point is a joker. The president has been dealt from the bottom of the deck. Congress is the house, are we the vigorish? But actually my idea is that we use the Republican rhetoric. They have claimed he has gotten everything he asked for, and have blaimed him for not using the Simpson-Bowles suggestions. In actuality, they did not come up with a concensus, and the president put it all on the table. So the Super Committe does not have to fail, it just needs to report a non-consensus, and Congress can do their usual thing, and they can risk failure, which might be still better*. Ideally there will be up or down votes on parts of it whether they reach consensus or not. Then it will be the peoples turn to deal, at election time. It that is bringing in politics, that is what brings in the people. And that "my friends", is the name of the game, not to channel McCain.
* embedded "kick the can" misplaced
Thursday, August 04, 2011
Happy Birthday President Obama!
Best Wishes!
Is this a present from Alan Simpson?
Super Committee in balance.
[update to 8-1-11 original -
Final Notes: Hall and Bashir 2B updated (alter or Bane).]
Hall TDR
Bashir
2B
[update to 8-3-11 original -
8-3-11 Obama/Simpson/Bowles follow-up: and interesting Tangent. NFRY files or fries.]
Not Yet. Or Dylan but Alter or Altar*.
See the Graphic Launch.
Putting America Back to Work.
*Cillizza
Fineman/Walsh
Finney/Heye
[Rhodes/O'Donnell and real lures.]
[And a suggested birthday present from leaders Pelosi and Reid, their nomination of strong leaders for the super committee.]
Is this a present from Alan Simpson?
Super Committee in balance.
[update to 8-1-11 original -
Final Notes: Hall and Bashir 2B updated (alter or Bane).]
Hall TDR
Bashir
2B
[update to 8-3-11 original -
8-3-11 Obama/Simpson/Bowles follow-up: and interesting Tangent. NFRY files or fries.]
Not Yet. Or Dylan but Alter or Altar*.
See the Graphic Launch.
Putting America Back to Work.
*Cillizza
Fineman/Walsh
Finney/Heye
[Rhodes/O'Donnell and real lures.]
[And a suggested birthday present from leaders Pelosi and Reid, their nomination of strong leaders for the super committee.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)